Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Ex-parte assessment u/s 144 treated unexplained cash deposits as undisclosed and unexplained income, added to the assessee's total income u/s 68 read with Section 69A. Where sums are credited in the assessee's books, the same may be charged as income if the assessee's explanation is unsatisfactory, creating prima facie evidence against the assessee. The burden is on the assessee to rebut the presumption of income receipt. In this case, despite notices, the assessee did not appear or furnish explanations before the authorities. The belated explanation of amounts collected as a recovery agent was found unreasonable. The AO, CIT(Appeals), NFAC, and ITAT concurrently concluded that the assessee failed to rebut the presumption u/s 68 read with Section 69A. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Vijay Kumar Talwar, the ITAT's finding based on records is correct, and no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed at the admission stage without notice to the other side.
Ex-parte assessment u/s 144 treated unexplained cash deposits as undisclosed and unexplained income, added to the assessee's total income u/s 68 read with Section 69A. Where sums are credited in the assessee's books, the same may be charged as income if the assessee's explanation is unsatisfactory, creating prima facie evidence against the assessee. The burden is on the assessee to rebut the presumption of income receipt. In this case, despite notices, the assessee did not appear or furnish explanations before the authorities. The belated explanation of amounts collected as a recovery agent was found unreasonable. The AO, CIT(Appeals), NFAC, and ITAT concurrently concluded that the assessee failed to rebut the presumption u/s 68 read with Section 69A. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Vijay Kumar Talwar, the ITAT's finding based on records is correct, and no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed at the admission stage without notice to the other side.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
