Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Salary paid to an accountant at Rs. 12,000 per month is not liable for tax deduction at source u/s 194J as it is a salary expenditure, not payment towards professional or technical services. The total salary amount paid is below the taxable limit, hence no TDS obligation arises u/s 192. Consequently, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source u/s 194J is deleted as the payment is towards salary and not professional fees. The Appellate Tribunal set aside the findings of the CIT(A) and allowed the assessee's appeal on this issue.
Salary paid to an accountant at Rs. 12,000 per month is not liable for tax deduction at source u/s 194J as it is a salary expenditure, not payment towards professional or technical services. The total salary amount paid is below the taxable limit, hence no TDS obligation arises u/s 192. Consequently, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source u/s 194J is deleted as the payment is towards salary and not professional fees. The Appellate Tribunal set aside the findings of the CIT(A) and allowed the assessee's appeal on this issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.