Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal observed that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte without deciding issues on merits, which is not in consonance with Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) is required to adjudicate issues arising in the appeal on merits by stating points for determination, decision thereon, and reasons. The CIT(A) has power to make inquiries u/s 250(4). The notice of hearing was not properly served on the assessee as required u/s 282 read with Rule 127. The assessee claimed business closure since 2018 but did not intimate the revenue as required u/s 176(3). The assessee is a partnership firm, and Section 189(4) applies in case of discontinuance or dissolution after assessment proceedings commenced. Complete inquiry is required regarding the firm's status, and the assessee must furnish true and correct facts before the CIT(A). The appellate order is set aside, and the matter is restored to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication, providing proper opportunity to both parties. The assessee must comply with notices; otherwise, an ex-parte order on merits may be passed.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal observed that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte without deciding issues on merits, which is not in consonance with Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) is required to adjudicate issues arising in the appeal on merits by stating points for determination, decision thereon, and reasons. The CIT(A) has power to make inquiries u/s 250(4). The notice of hearing was not properly served on the assessee as required u/s 282 read with Rule 127. The assessee claimed business closure since 2018 but did not intimate the revenue as required u/s 176(3). The assessee is a partnership firm, and Section 189(4) applies in case of discontinuance or dissolution after assessment proceedings commenced. Complete inquiry is required regarding the firm's status, and the assessee must furnish true and correct facts before the CIT(A). The appellate order is set aside, and the matter is restored to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication, providing proper opportunity to both parties. The assessee must comply with notices; otherwise, an ex-parte order on merits may be passed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.