Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal observed that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte without deciding issues on merits, which is not in consonance with Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) is required to adjudicate issues arising in the appeal on merits by stating points for determination, decision thereon, and reasons. The CIT(A) has power to make inquiries u/s 250(4). The notice of hearing was not properly served on the assessee as required u/s 282 read with Rule 127. The assessee claimed business closure since 2018 but did not intimate the revenue as required u/s 176(3). The assessee is a partnership firm, and Section 189(4) applies in case of discontinuance or dissolution after assessment proceedings commenced. Complete inquiry is required regarding the firm's status, and the assessee must furnish true and correct facts before the CIT(A). The appellate order is set aside, and the matter is restored to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication, providing proper opportunity to both parties. The assessee must comply with notices; otherwise, an ex-parte order on merits may be passed.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal observed that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte without deciding issues on merits, which is not in consonance with Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) is required to adjudicate issues arising in the appeal on merits by stating points for determination, decision thereon, and reasons. The CIT(A) has power to make inquiries u/s 250(4). The notice of hearing was not properly served on the assessee as required u/s 282 read with Rule 127. The assessee claimed business closure since 2018 but did not intimate the revenue as required u/s 176(3). The assessee is a partnership firm, and Section 189(4) applies in case of discontinuance or dissolution after assessment proceedings commenced. Complete inquiry is required regarding the firm's status, and the assessee must furnish true and correct facts before the CIT(A). The appellate order is set aside, and the matter is restored to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication, providing proper opportunity to both parties. The assessee must comply with notices; otherwise, an ex-parte order on merits may be passed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.