Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
This case pertains to the maintainability of appeals by the Committee of Chief Commissioners u/s 129D of the Customs Act, 1962, concerning breaches of regulation 10 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. The Tribunal, relying on the Delhi High Court's decision in a similar case, held that such appeals by the licensing authority are not maintainable. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that it was initiated without legal authority.
This case pertains to the maintainability of appeals by the Committee of Chief Commissioners u/s 129D of the Customs Act, 1962, concerning breaches of regulation 10 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. The Tribunal, relying on the Delhi High Court's decision in a similar case, held that such appeals by the licensing authority are not maintainable. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that it was initiated without legal authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
