Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
This case pertains to the maintainability of appeals by the Committee of Chief Commissioners u/s 129D of the Customs Act, 1962, concerning breaches of regulation 10 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. The Tribunal, relying on the Delhi High Court's decision in a similar case, held that such appeals by the licensing authority are not maintainable. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that it was initiated without legal authority.
This case pertains to the maintainability of appeals by the Committee of Chief Commissioners u/s 129D of the Customs Act, 1962, concerning breaches of regulation 10 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. The Tribunal, relying on the Delhi High Court's decision in a similar case, held that such appeals by the licensing authority are not maintainable. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that it was initiated without legal authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
