Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The appellant lacked locus standi to challenge the admission order passed by the Adjudicating Authority on a Section 7 application filed by SREI Equipment Finance Limited against the corporate debtor for default in repayment of a Rs. 300 crore loan. The appellant's case was based on a Share Purchase Agreement with two shareholders of the corporate debtor, which could not be implemented due to the Enforcement Directorate's attachment of the land. The appellant had agreed to repay the corporate debtor's loan amount through a Settlement Award. However, the debt and default were not denied by either the corporate debtor or the appellant. Since the debt and default were admitted facts, the Adjudicating Authority did not err in admitting the Section 7 application. The appeal was dismissed.
The appellant lacked locus standi to challenge the admission order passed by the Adjudicating Authority on a Section 7 application filed by SREI Equipment Finance Limited against the corporate debtor for default in repayment of a Rs. 300 crore loan. The appellant's case was based on a Share Purchase Agreement with two shareholders of the corporate debtor, which could not be implemented due to the Enforcement Directorate's attachment of the land. The appellant had agreed to repay the corporate debtor's loan amount through a Settlement Award. However, the debt and default were not denied by either the corporate debtor or the appellant. Since the debt and default were admitted facts, the Adjudicating Authority did not err in admitting the Section 7 application. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
