Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The petitioner challenged the imposition of entry tax on crude soybean oil brought into Madhya Pradesh for manufacturing/refining soybean refined oil under the MPCT Act and Entry Tax Act. The petitioner argued that if refining crude soybean oil is considered manufacturing, then crude oil being a raw material would be exempt. The court held that refining crude oil into refined soybean oil constitutes a manufacturing process, resulting in a new consumable product. Despite the notification excluding refining from manufacturing under the MPCT Act, entry tax is leviable under the Entry Tax Act for consumption/use or sale in the local area. The court dismissed the petitions, upholding the tax authorities' orders imposing entry tax on crude soybean oil brought for refining into refined soybean oil.
The petitioner challenged the imposition of entry tax on crude soybean oil brought into Madhya Pradesh for manufacturing/refining soybean refined oil under the MPCT Act and Entry Tax Act. The petitioner argued that if refining crude soybean oil is considered manufacturing, then crude oil being a raw material would be exempt. The court held that refining crude oil into refined soybean oil constitutes a manufacturing process, resulting in a new consumable product. Despite the notification excluding refining from manufacturing under the MPCT Act, entry tax is leviable under the Entry Tax Act for consumption/use or sale in the local area. The court dismissed the petitions, upholding the tax authorities' orders imposing entry tax on crude soybean oil brought for refining into refined soybean oil.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.