Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Blocking of a supplier's credit ledger by mentioning 'Registration of supplier has been cancelled' without issuing a show cause notice violates principles of natural justice. Section 74 statutorily recognizes and mandates adherence to natural justice principles, while Rule 86A is silent on this aspect. Implementing Rule 86A without following natural justice may cause hardship and injustice, contrary to the lawmakers' intent. The Calcutta High Court's judgment in Basanta Kumar Shaw did not address whether natural justice principles apply to Rule 86A. Input Tax Credit is a concession, not a vested right, but natural justice principles must be read into Rule 86A. Blocking the petitioners' electronic credit ledger without following natural justice and assigning adequate reasons cannot sustain judicial scrutiny. The impugned action is set aside, and the petition is allowed.
Blocking of a supplier's credit ledger by mentioning 'Registration of supplier has been cancelled' without issuing a show cause notice violates principles of natural justice. Section 74 statutorily recognizes and mandates adherence to natural justice principles, while Rule 86A is silent on this aspect. Implementing Rule 86A without following natural justice may cause hardship and injustice, contrary to the lawmakers' intent. The Calcutta High Court's judgment in Basanta Kumar Shaw did not address whether natural justice principles apply to Rule 86A. Input Tax Credit is a concession, not a vested right, but natural justice principles must be read into Rule 86A. Blocking the petitioners' electronic credit ledger without following natural justice and assigning adequate reasons cannot sustain judicial scrutiny. The impugned action is set aside, and the petition is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.