Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
ITC availed in excess of credit reflected in GSTR-2A, mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A, ITC not reversed based on GSTR-2A debit, non-generation of e-way bill. Petitioner seeks opportunity to explain discrepancies, invoking principles of natural justice. High Court set aside impugned order, directed petitioner to deposit 25% of disputed tax after adjusting Rs. 1,00,000 already paid within 4 weeks to lift bank attachment. Impugned assessment order treated as show cause notice, petitioner to file objections with supporting documents within 4 weeks. Respondent to consider objections after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing and pass orders in accordance with law. Writ Petition disposed of.
ITC availed in excess of credit reflected in GSTR-2A, mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A, ITC not reversed based on GSTR-2A debit, non-generation of e-way bill. Petitioner seeks opportunity to explain discrepancies, invoking principles of natural justice. High Court set aside impugned order, directed petitioner to deposit 25% of disputed tax after adjusting Rs. 1,00,000 already paid within 4 weeks to lift bank attachment. Impugned assessment order treated as show cause notice, petitioner to file objections with supporting documents within 4 weeks. Respondent to consider objections after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing and pass orders in accordance with law. Writ Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
