Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Impugned proceedings challenged for exceeding scope of show cause notice, non-consideration of submissions during investigation and payments made, gross non-application of mind to material facts, and violation of natural justice principles. Impugned order set aside, petitioner directed to deposit 25% of disputed tax within two weeks, tax already paid adjusted towards deposit. Impugned assessment order treated as show cause notice, petitioner to submit objections with supporting documents within four weeks. Petition disposed of.
Impugned proceedings challenged for exceeding scope of show cause notice, non-consideration of submissions during investigation and payments made, gross non-application of mind to material facts, and violation of natural justice principles. Impugned order set aside, petitioner directed to deposit 25% of disputed tax within two weeks, tax already paid adjusted towards deposit. Impugned assessment order treated as show cause notice, petitioner to submit objections with supporting documents within four weeks. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
