Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on information received from the tax department's investigation wing regarding two entities from whom the petitioner had availed supplies. The principal allegation was that the petitioner had availed accommodation entries from these two non-existent suppliers, suggesting that the petitioner's income for the relevant assessment year escaped assessment. Although the petitioner produced documents supporting genuine purchases, no material was provided to establish the creditworthiness or substance of the two named entities. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer had sufficient grounds to suggest that the assessee's income had escaped assessment, and it was not necessary for the court to adjudicate the allegations at this stage. The petition was dismissed.
The reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on information received from the tax department's investigation wing regarding two entities from whom the petitioner had availed supplies. The principal allegation was that the petitioner had availed accommodation entries from these two non-existent suppliers, suggesting that the petitioner's income for the relevant assessment year escaped assessment. Although the petitioner produced documents supporting genuine purchases, no material was provided to establish the creditworthiness or substance of the two named entities. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer had sufficient grounds to suggest that the assessee's income had escaped assessment, and it was not necessary for the court to adjudicate the allegations at this stage. The petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.