Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Non-granting interest u/s 244A on excess self-assessment tax from January 2017 to October 2017 was denied, citing the refund was less than 10% of the tax determined in regular assessment u/s 143(3). The assessee argued the self-assessment tax, adjusted against the demand raised in assessment, lost its character. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee's contention, referring to the decision in AWP Assistance (I) Pvt. Ltd. Once adjusted against the tax liability determined in regular assessment, the self-assessment tax no longer retained its character under sub-clause (aa) of Section 244A(1). After adjustment, the refund fell under sub-clause (b) of Section 244A(1), not hit by the proviso denying interest where refund is below 10%. Consequently, the assessee is entitled to interest on the refund of self-assessment tax for January 2017 to October 2017.
Non-granting interest u/s 244A on excess self-assessment tax from January 2017 to October 2017 was denied, citing the refund was less than 10% of the tax determined in regular assessment u/s 143(3). The assessee argued the self-assessment tax, adjusted against the demand raised in assessment, lost its character. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee's contention, referring to the decision in AWP Assistance (I) Pvt. Ltd. Once adjusted against the tax liability determined in regular assessment, the self-assessment tax no longer retained its character under sub-clause (aa) of Section 244A(1). After adjustment, the refund fell under sub-clause (b) of Section 244A(1), not hit by the proviso denying interest where refund is below 10%. Consequently, the assessee is entitled to interest on the refund of self-assessment tax for January 2017 to October 2017.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.