Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessment officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act, citing Section 147(b) as the basis for approval, which is a non-existent provision. The sanctioning authority granted approval without considering this vital aspect, indicating a lack of independent application of mind and inquiry into the matter. The approval was granted mechanically and perfunctorily, without providing minimal reasons for satisfaction. The transaction in question involved parties other than the assessee. The reasons recorded for exercising jurisdiction u/s 147 were plagued with critical defects, rendering the reassessment proceedings invalid u/s 292B of the Act. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings were held to be bad in law, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The assessment officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act, citing Section 147(b) as the basis for approval, which is a non-existent provision. The sanctioning authority granted approval without considering this vital aspect, indicating a lack of independent application of mind and inquiry into the matter. The approval was granted mechanically and perfunctorily, without providing minimal reasons for satisfaction. The transaction in question involved parties other than the assessee. The reasons recorded for exercising jurisdiction u/s 147 were plagued with critical defects, rendering the reassessment proceedings invalid u/s 292B of the Act. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings were held to be bad in law, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
