Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting assessee's return, which included export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation as other business income. Subsequently, notice u/s 154 issued based on audit objection regarding disallowance of export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation from deduction u/s 80IC, but no rectification order passed. After four years, reopening assessment initiated, alleging escaped assessment. Assessee contended all material facts fully disclosed during original assessment and compliance with Section 154 notice. Held, no new material available after four years to justify reopening. Assessee truthfully disclosed all relevant facts. Notice u/s 148 invalid, addition made by Assessing Officer deleted. Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of assessee, setting aside reassessment proceedings beyond four-year period due to lack of undisclosed new material.
Assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting assessee's return, which included export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation as other business income. Subsequently, notice u/s 154 issued based on audit objection regarding disallowance of export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation from deduction u/s 80IC, but no rectification order passed. After four years, reopening assessment initiated, alleging escaped assessment. Assessee contended all material facts fully disclosed during original assessment and compliance with Section 154 notice. Held, no new material available after four years to justify reopening. Assessee truthfully disclosed all relevant facts. Notice u/s 148 invalid, addition made by Assessing Officer deleted. Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of assessee, setting aside reassessment proceedings beyond four-year period due to lack of undisclosed new material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.