Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed sales. The key points are: The addition was modified from gross profit basis to net profit basis by the CIT(A) and further restricted to 1% of turnover by the ITAT. Different authorities adopted varying estimates for determining the assessee's income, ranging from GP/NP on alleged suppressed turnover to 1% net profit on declared turnover. The addition towards undisclosed investments was deleted. The High Court confirmed the ITAT's order. In such cases of differing estimates, penalty cannot be levied for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The jurisdictional High Court's judgment in CIT vs. Valimkbhai H. Patel supported this view. Penalty under 271(1)(c) was deleted. For 271AAA, no penalty can be imposed on the remaining 1% net profit addition on declared turnover in the absence of identified assets representing undisclosed income.
Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed sales. The key points are: The addition was modified from gross profit basis to net profit basis by the CIT(A) and further restricted to 1% of turnover by the ITAT. Different authorities adopted varying estimates for determining the assessee's income, ranging from GP/NP on alleged suppressed turnover to 1% net profit on declared turnover. The addition towards undisclosed investments was deleted. The High Court confirmed the ITAT's order. In such cases of differing estimates, penalty cannot be levied for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The jurisdictional High Court's judgment in CIT vs. Valimkbhai H. Patel supported this view. Penalty under 271(1)(c) was deleted. For 271AAA, no penalty can be imposed on the remaining 1% net profit addition on declared turnover in the absence of identified assets representing undisclosed income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.