Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Joint ownership of multiple residential properties at the time of sale of the original asset does not disqualify the assessee from claiming deduction u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act. The Appellate Tribunal, relying on the judgments of the Madras High Court in Dr. Smt. P.K.Vasanthi Rangarajan and the Mumbai ITAT in Zainul Abedin Ghaswala, held that merely owning another property jointly on the transfer date cannot be a ground for denying Section 54F deduction on capital gains from the sale of the original asset. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings, dismissing the Revenue's grounds on this issue.
Joint ownership of multiple residential properties at the time of sale of the original asset does not disqualify the assessee from claiming deduction u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act. The Appellate Tribunal, relying on the judgments of the Madras High Court in Dr. Smt. P.K.Vasanthi Rangarajan and the Mumbai ITAT in Zainul Abedin Ghaswala, held that merely owning another property jointly on the transfer date cannot be a ground for denying Section 54F deduction on capital gains from the sale of the original asset. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings, dismissing the Revenue's grounds on this issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
