PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the repayment of a loan in cash to a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) is not entirely free from doubt, considering the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) notification dated 9th March 2017. The RBI notification provides a plausible view, and the Tribunal found reasonable cause u/s 273B of the Income Tax Act in the peculiar facts of the case. Additionally, the Tribunal acknowledged the genuineness of the transaction in question. Consequently, the levy of penalty u/s 271E of the Income Tax Act was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the repayment of a loan in cash to a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) is not entirely free from doubt, considering the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) notification dated 9th March 2017. The RBI notification provides a plausible view, and the Tribunal found reasonable cause u/s 273B of the Income Tax Act in the peculiar facts of the case. Additionally, the Tribunal acknowledged the genuineness of the transaction in question. Consequently, the levy of penalty u/s 271E of the Income Tax Act was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.