Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has adjudicated on various issues concerning deductions u/ss 80IA(4), 14A, and 35D. Regarding Section 80IA(4) deduction, the ITAT found the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]'s observations inadequate to determine the assessee's eligibility as a developer. Hence, the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after examining relevant evidence and providing an opportunity of being heard. Concerning Section 14A disallowance, the ITAT held that no disallowance u/r 8D(2)(b) was warranted as the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds. However, the disallowance u/r 8D(2)(c) was upheld, subject to the CIT(A)'s fresh adjudication on its impact on Section 80IA(4) deduction. Regarding Section 35D disallowance, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order in part and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after considering the assessee's evidence and following the principles of natural justice.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has adjudicated on various issues concerning deductions u/ss 80IA(4), 14A, and 35D. Regarding Section 80IA(4) deduction, the ITAT found the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]'s observations inadequate to determine the assessee's eligibility as a developer. Hence, the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after examining relevant evidence and providing an opportunity of being heard. Concerning Section 14A disallowance, the ITAT held that no disallowance u/r 8D(2)(b) was warranted as the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds. However, the disallowance u/r 8D(2)(c) was upheld, subject to the CIT(A)'s fresh adjudication on its impact on Section 80IA(4) deduction. Regarding Section 35D disallowance, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order in part and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after considering the assessee's evidence and following the principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
