Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has adjudicated on various issues concerning deductions u/ss 80IA(4), 14A, and 35D. Regarding Section 80IA(4) deduction, the ITAT found the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]'s observations inadequate to determine the assessee's eligibility as a developer. Hence, the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after examining relevant evidence and providing an opportunity of being heard. Concerning Section 14A disallowance, the ITAT held that no disallowance u/r 8D(2)(b) was warranted as the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds. However, the disallowance u/r 8D(2)(c) was upheld, subject to the CIT(A)'s fresh adjudication on its impact on Section 80IA(4) deduction. Regarding Section 35D disallowance, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order in part and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after considering the assessee's evidence and following the principles of natural justice.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has adjudicated on various issues concerning deductions u/ss 80IA(4), 14A, and 35D. Regarding Section 80IA(4) deduction, the ITAT found the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]'s observations inadequate to determine the assessee's eligibility as a developer. Hence, the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after examining relevant evidence and providing an opportunity of being heard. Concerning Section 14A disallowance, the ITAT held that no disallowance u/r 8D(2)(b) was warranted as the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds. However, the disallowance u/r 8D(2)(c) was upheld, subject to the CIT(A)'s fresh adjudication on its impact on Section 80IA(4) deduction. Regarding Section 35D disallowance, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order in part and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after considering the assessee's evidence and following the principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
