Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The appellant wrongly relied upon the Amanjyot Singh case and changed stance during final arguments, having earlier contended the 26.05.2016 notice invoked personal guarantee. The Amanjyot Singh case involved Section 13(2) notice to corporate debtor and guarantors jointly by Punjab and Sind Bank on 04.10.2023. Section 18 provides for acknowledgement in writing, and the balance sheet indicating liability is such acknowledgement. The balance sheet signed by appellants on 01.09.2017 indicates debt from that date as per Supreme Court's Asset Reconstruction Company case. Counting limitation from 26.05.2016 to 01.09.2017, three years would restart from 01.09.2017 and end on 31.08.2020, which fell during COVID-19 period extended by Supreme Court till 01.03.2022 plus 90 days. Hence, the 02.12.2021 Section 95 application by Respondent 1 was within limitation. The appeals lack merit and are dismissed.
The appellant wrongly relied upon the Amanjyot Singh case and changed stance during final arguments, having earlier contended the 26.05.2016 notice invoked personal guarantee. The Amanjyot Singh case involved Section 13(2) notice to corporate debtor and guarantors jointly by Punjab and Sind Bank on 04.10.2023. Section 18 provides for acknowledgement in writing, and the balance sheet indicating liability is such acknowledgement. The balance sheet signed by appellants on 01.09.2017 indicates debt from that date as per Supreme Court's Asset Reconstruction Company case. Counting limitation from 26.05.2016 to 01.09.2017, three years would restart from 01.09.2017 and end on 31.08.2020, which fell during COVID-19 period extended by Supreme Court till 01.03.2022 plus 90 days. Hence, the 02.12.2021 Section 95 application by Respondent 1 was within limitation. The appeals lack merit and are dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.