Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Capital gains u/s 50 arising from the sale of long-term capital assets, though deemed as short-term capital gains, should be taxed at the rates applicable to long-term capital gains u/s 112. The fiction of treating them as short-term gains is limited to Section 50 and cannot convert the nature of the asset for other purposes. Consequently, the concessional 20% tax rate u/s 112 applies. However, a dissenting view holds that Section 50 determines the chargeability, and Section 112(1) prescribes the rate, rendering the gains taxable as short-term. The conflicting interpretations aim to prevent double benefits from depreciation while adhering to legislative intent. The issue requires resolution by a regular bench for other aspects raised in cross-appeals.
Capital gains u/s 50 arising from the sale of long-term capital assets, though deemed as short-term capital gains, should be taxed at the rates applicable to long-term capital gains u/s 112. The fiction of treating them as short-term gains is limited to Section 50 and cannot convert the nature of the asset for other purposes. Consequently, the concessional 20% tax rate u/s 112 applies. However, a dissenting view holds that Section 50 determines the chargeability, and Section 112(1) prescribes the rate, rendering the gains taxable as short-term. The conflicting interpretations aim to prevent double benefits from depreciation while adhering to legislative intent. The issue requires resolution by a regular bench for other aspects raised in cross-appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.