Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal held that the issuance of a valid notice u/s 143(2) is a prerequisite for framing a valid assessment, in line with the Supreme Court's judgments in Hotel Blue Moon and Laxman Das Khandelwal. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had failed to issue a valid notice u/s 143(2) before framing the assessment u/s 147. The Tribunal was unable to accept the revenue's contention to cover the issue u/s 292BB. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 due to the lack of a valid assumption of jurisdiction arising from the non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2), deciding in favor of the assessee.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the issuance of a valid notice u/s 143(2) is a prerequisite for framing a valid assessment, in line with the Supreme Court's judgments in Hotel Blue Moon and Laxman Das Khandelwal. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had failed to issue a valid notice u/s 143(2) before framing the assessment u/s 147. The Tribunal was unable to accept the revenue's contention to cover the issue u/s 292BB. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 due to the lack of a valid assumption of jurisdiction arising from the non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2), deciding in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.