Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Assessment u/s 153C - Profit estimation on money received for new construction and redevelopment projects - extrapolation of income for the search period. The assessee contended that in the absence of any incriminating material seized from the premises, no addition could have been made u/s 153C for the assessment year under consideration. It was held that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not consider or hold the cash found as unexplained cash of the assessee, and it cannot be automatically subsumed in the addition related to 'on-money' without an express finding by the AO. The AO made an addition related to on-money based on material impounded during the survey and not under the search action. Therefore, no addition could have been made by the AO in assessments completed for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2016-17 invoking Section 153C/153A of the Act. Even if the cash found was considered undisclosed income for the assessment year 2017-18, no addition can be made for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2016-17. The additions made without any incriminating material found in the search were deleted, and the decision was in favor of the assessee. Regarding the validity of assessment proceedings u/s 153C/153A beyond the period of limitation and the selection of the initial assessment year.
Assessment u/s 153C - Profit estimation on money received for new construction and redevelopment projects - extrapolation of income for the search period. The assessee contended that in the absence of any incriminating material seized from the premises, no addition could have been made u/s 153C for the assessment year under consideration. It was held that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not consider or hold the cash found as unexplained cash of the assessee, and it cannot be automatically subsumed in the addition related to 'on-money' without an express finding by the AO. The AO made an addition related to on-money based on material impounded during the survey and not under the search action. Therefore, no addition could have been made by the AO in assessments completed for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2016-17 invoking Section 153C/153A of the Act. Even if the cash found was considered undisclosed income for the assessment year 2017-18, no addition can be made for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2016-17. The additions made without any incriminating material found in the search were deleted, and the decision was in favor of the assessee. Regarding the validity of assessment proceedings u/s 153C/153A beyond the period of limitation and the selection of the initial assessment year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
