Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Transaction value must be accepted as assessable value unless proven incorrect through independent evidence, mere reference to NIDB data insufficient. Onus on Department to demonstrate how relationship between importer and overseas supplier influenced prices. No evidence that agreed values incorrect, original authority recorded relationship did not affect invoice price. NIDB data cannot be sole basis for value enhancement without establishing comparability in quality, quantity, origin, commercial factors affecting transaction value. Lack of communication to appellant regarding doubts on declared transaction value violates Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed by Appellate Tribunal.
Transaction value must be accepted as assessable value unless proven incorrect through independent evidence, mere reference to NIDB data insufficient. Onus on Department to demonstrate how relationship between importer and overseas supplier influenced prices. No evidence that agreed values incorrect, original authority recorded relationship did not affect invoice price. NIDB data cannot be sole basis for value enhancement without establishing comparability in quality, quantity, origin, commercial factors affecting transaction value. Lack of communication to appellant regarding doubts on declared transaction value violates Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed by Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.