Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The appellant availed CENVAT credit prior to registration. The department demanded interest on such credit, which was held impermissible as no demand for recovery of ineligible credit was raised. The appellant provided Clinical Research Management and Resourcing (CMR) services and Data Management services. The department alleged CMR services did not qualify as export, but confirmed demand for entire turnover including Data Management services, which was incorrect. Data Management services were accepted as exports by granting refunds, establishing they fulfilled export conditions. CMR services also qualified as export under Export of Service Rules as the services involved testing, analysis, and delivery of reports outside India. The extended period of limitation was invoked alleging suppression of facts, which was held unjustified as the appellant filed returns and obtained refunds for Data Management services. Penalties imposed under Finance Act and CENVAT Credit Rules were set aside. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order as unsustainable.
The appellant availed CENVAT credit prior to registration. The department demanded interest on such credit, which was held impermissible as no demand for recovery of ineligible credit was raised. The appellant provided Clinical Research Management and Resourcing (CMR) services and Data Management services. The department alleged CMR services did not qualify as export, but confirmed demand for entire turnover including Data Management services, which was incorrect. Data Management services were accepted as exports by granting refunds, establishing they fulfilled export conditions. CMR services also qualified as export under Export of Service Rules as the services involved testing, analysis, and delivery of reports outside India. The extended period of limitation was invoked alleging suppression of facts, which was held unjustified as the appellant filed returns and obtained refunds for Data Management services. Penalties imposed under Finance Act and CENVAT Credit Rules were set aside. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order as unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.