Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Jurisdiction of the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) to change the "head" of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) provision from "salary u/s 192" to "commission u/s 194A" in proceedings u/s 154 read with Section 200A. The assessee's contention is that Section 200A, being a complete code for processing TDS returns, overrides other general provisions, and the NFAC cannot change the head of TDS applicability once TDS has been deducted u/s 192 at the time of payment. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's arguments, concluding that the NFAC erred in law and on facts in raising the demand by changing the head from "salary" to "commission," and the demand was reversed.
Jurisdiction of the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) to change the "head" of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) provision from "salary u/s 192" to "commission u/s 194A" in proceedings u/s 154 read with Section 200A. The assessee's contention is that Section 200A, being a complete code for processing TDS returns, overrides other general provisions, and the NFAC cannot change the head of TDS applicability once TDS has been deducted u/s 192 at the time of payment. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's arguments, concluding that the NFAC erred in law and on facts in raising the demand by changing the head from "salary" to "commission," and the demand was reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
