Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Priority of dues between the Central Excise Department and secured creditors in cases of attachment of properties for recovery. The Supreme Court held that the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not provide for a first charge on the assessee's property, giving priority to secured creditors' dues over excise dues. However, in the case of Sales Tax and VAT, the Supreme Court ruled that the State is a secured creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Debt Recovery Tribunal correctly dismissed the objections raised by the company regarding the order of attachment for recovery of dues by attaching properties, considering the legal position on priority of dues.
Priority of dues between the Central Excise Department and secured creditors in cases of attachment of properties for recovery. The Supreme Court held that the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not provide for a first charge on the assessee's property, giving priority to secured creditors' dues over excise dues. However, in the case of Sales Tax and VAT, the Supreme Court ruled that the State is a secured creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Debt Recovery Tribunal correctly dismissed the objections raised by the company regarding the order of attachment for recovery of dues by attaching properties, considering the legal position on priority of dues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
