Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Predicate offence involving meagre disclosed income but substantial investment in properties without proof of legitimate source. Provisional attachment of immovable properties permissible u/s 5(1) of the Act of 2002 to prevent likelihood of transfer. Inability to produce evidence substantiating claims of loans for property purchase. Dismissal of appeal as arguments regarding lack of material/evidence for involvement and against attachment found unsubstantiated. Attachment upheld to prevent potential transfer of tainted properties pending trial conclusion.
Predicate offence involving meagre disclosed income but substantial investment in properties without proof of legitimate source. Provisional attachment of immovable properties permissible u/s 5(1) of the Act of 2002 to prevent likelihood of transfer. Inability to produce evidence substantiating claims of loans for property purchase. Dismissal of appeal as arguments regarding lack of material/evidence for involvement and against attachment found unsubstantiated. Attachment upheld to prevent potential transfer of tainted properties pending trial conclusion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.