Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Carry forward and set off of business losses u/s 32(2) is subject to the provisions of Sections 72(2) and 72(3). Depreciation allowance carried forward u/s 32(2), though deemed a business loss for Sections 71 and 72, can only be set off against profits or gains from any business or profession, and not against income from other sources. Section 72 is not always subject to Section 71, despite Section 32(2) permitting carry forward of depreciation allowance subject to Section 72. The High Court dismissed the writ petition, finding no error warranting exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Carry forward and set off of business losses u/s 32(2) is subject to the provisions of Sections 72(2) and 72(3). Depreciation allowance carried forward u/s 32(2), though deemed a business loss for Sections 71 and 72, can only be set off against profits or gains from any business or profession, and not against income from other sources. Section 72 is not always subject to Section 71, despite Section 32(2) permitting carry forward of depreciation allowance subject to Section 72. The High Court dismissed the writ petition, finding no error warranting exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.