Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Carry forward and set off of business losses u/s 32(2) is subject to the provisions of Sections 72(2) and 72(3). Depreciation allowance carried forward u/s 32(2), though deemed a business loss for Sections 71 and 72, can only be set off against profits or gains from any business or profession, and not against income from other sources. Section 72 is not always subject to Section 71, despite Section 32(2) permitting carry forward of depreciation allowance subject to Section 72. The High Court dismissed the writ petition, finding no error warranting exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Carry forward and set off of business losses u/s 32(2) is subject to the provisions of Sections 72(2) and 72(3). Depreciation allowance carried forward u/s 32(2), though deemed a business loss for Sections 71 and 72, can only be set off against profits or gains from any business or profession, and not against income from other sources. Section 72 is not always subject to Section 71, despite Section 32(2) permitting carry forward of depreciation allowance subject to Section 72. The High Court dismissed the writ petition, finding no error warranting exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
