Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee, after being amalgamated with another company, treated the excess consideration paid over the net assets acquired as goodwill and claimed depreciation at 25% on the written-down value. The tax authorities disallowed the claim. However, the Tribunal observed that the assessee had consistently claimed depreciation on goodwill since FY 2006-07, and the Revenue's appeals on this issue for previous years were dismissed by the Tribunal. Following its earlier decisions and a recent Kolkata Tribunal ruling in a similar case, the Tribunal decided the appeal in favor of the assessee, allowing the depreciation claim on goodwill.
The assessee, after being amalgamated with another company, treated the excess consideration paid over the net assets acquired as goodwill and claimed depreciation at 25% on the written-down value. The tax authorities disallowed the claim. However, the Tribunal observed that the assessee had consistently claimed depreciation on goodwill since FY 2006-07, and the Revenue's appeals on this issue for previous years were dismissed by the Tribunal. Following its earlier decisions and a recent Kolkata Tribunal ruling in a similar case, the Tribunal decided the appeal in favor of the assessee, allowing the depreciation claim on goodwill.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
