Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Capital gains exemption u/s 54F denied due to non-completion of construction within the stipulated period. The assessee entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA), receiving a residential villa in exchange for a plot of land. Despite a delay of over 7 years in completing construction against the 3-year period u/s 54F, the assessee failed to substantiate the explanation of a dispute among partners. No evidence was provided to demonstrate efforts made by the assessee to enforce rights under the agreement or ensure timely completion. Lack of vigilance and failure to exercise due diligence resulted in the dismissal of appeals by the Appellate Tribunal.
Capital gains exemption u/s 54F denied due to non-completion of construction within the stipulated period. The assessee entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA), receiving a residential villa in exchange for a plot of land. Despite a delay of over 7 years in completing construction against the 3-year period u/s 54F, the assessee failed to substantiate the explanation of a dispute among partners. No evidence was provided to demonstrate efforts made by the assessee to enforce rights under the agreement or ensure timely completion. Lack of vigilance and failure to exercise due diligence resulted in the dismissal of appeals by the Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
