Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Petitioner failed to submit original shipping bills to substantiate claimed exports, providing only photocopies which were not accepted for meeting export obligation. Two shipping bills fell outside extended export obligation period, two were Drawback Shipping Bills with rejected conversion requests. Petitioner claimed loss of Duty Exemption Entitlement Certificate Book but provided unsatisfactory explanation before Appellate and Reviewing Authorities. Petitioner did not submit required documents to demonstrate compliance with export obligation and failed to appear for personal hearings despite opportunities. Petitioner did not provide written response to objections raised. Petitioner failed to prove Customs Authority's agreement to convert Drawback Shipping Bills to DEEC Shipping Bills and did not submit documents proving export obligation fulfilment or pay prescribed customs duty. Orders rejecting review petition found reasonable based on facts, not arbitrary. High Court dismissed petition, finding no grounds for interference under Article 226 of Constitution of India, 1950.
Petitioner failed to submit original shipping bills to substantiate claimed exports, providing only photocopies which were not accepted for meeting export obligation. Two shipping bills fell outside extended export obligation period, two were Drawback Shipping Bills with rejected conversion requests. Petitioner claimed loss of Duty Exemption Entitlement Certificate Book but provided unsatisfactory explanation before Appellate and Reviewing Authorities. Petitioner did not submit required documents to demonstrate compliance with export obligation and failed to appear for personal hearings despite opportunities. Petitioner did not provide written response to objections raised. Petitioner failed to prove Customs Authority's agreement to convert Drawback Shipping Bills to DEEC Shipping Bills and did not submit documents proving export obligation fulfilment or pay prescribed customs duty. Orders rejecting review petition found reasonable based on facts, not arbitrary. High Court dismissed petition, finding no grounds for interference under Article 226 of Constitution of India, 1950.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
