Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
The Adjudicating Authority had the power to recall its earlier order, which contained factual mistakes, and pass a corrected order regarding the return of the Corporate Debtor's engine and APU, which were in the Appellant's possession and of greater value. The Appellate Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority did not review or recall its earlier order but corrected genuine mistakes based on mistaken facts. The power to recall a judgment can be exercised when the ground for reopening was not available or pleaded earlier, and no other remedy was available. The Adjudicating Authority correctly passed the impugned order, and the appeal was dismissed.
The Adjudicating Authority had the power to recall its earlier order, which contained factual mistakes, and pass a corrected order regarding the return of the Corporate Debtor's engine and APU, which were in the Appellant's possession and of greater value. The Appellate Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority did not review or recall its earlier order but corrected genuine mistakes based on mistaken facts. The power to recall a judgment can be exercised when the ground for reopening was not available or pleaded earlier, and no other remedy was available. The Adjudicating Authority correctly passed the impugned order, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
