Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1221 to 1240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest claim for refund of amount deposited under protest was denied as the refund applications were processed within a month of receipt, falling within the three-month grace period u/ss 11BB and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant was not entitled to interest from the date of deposit due to the proviso in Section 35FF for amounts deposited prior to the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014. The appeals were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal.
Interest claim for refund of amount deposited under protest was denied as the refund applications were processed within a month of receipt, falling within the three-month grace period u/ss 11BB and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant was not entitled to interest from the date of deposit due to the proviso in Section 35FF for amounts deposited prior to the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014. The appeals were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
