Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest claim for refund of amount deposited under protest was denied as the refund applications were processed within a month of receipt, falling within the three-month grace period u/ss 11BB and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant was not entitled to interest from the date of deposit due to the proviso in Section 35FF for amounts deposited prior to the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014. The appeals were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal.
Interest claim for refund of amount deposited under protest was denied as the refund applications were processed within a month of receipt, falling within the three-month grace period u/ss 11BB and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant was not entitled to interest from the date of deposit due to the proviso in Section 35FF for amounts deposited prior to the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014. The appeals were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
