Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
The High Court quashed the order dated 20 December 2023, issued u/s 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, demanding Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on reinsurance services provided by a multinational insurance company registered as a foreign reinsurance branch with IRDAI and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, for the period 01 July 2017 to 25 July 2018. The court held that the amendments introduced by the GST Council and the Union Government through Notification No. 09/2023 and No. 56, specifically including Serial No. 40 in Entry 36A, were curative in nature and regularized the period from 01 July 2017 to 26 July 2018. Consequently, the impugned order, relating to the same period, could not be sustained in light of the respondents' stand, and the petition was allowed.
The High Court quashed the order dated 20 December 2023, issued u/s 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, demanding Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on reinsurance services provided by a multinational insurance company registered as a foreign reinsurance branch with IRDAI and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, for the period 01 July 2017 to 25 July 2018. The court held that the amendments introduced by the GST Council and the Union Government through Notification No. 09/2023 and No. 56, specifically including Serial No. 40 in Entry 36A, were curative in nature and regularized the period from 01 July 2017 to 26 July 2018. Consequently, the impugned order, relating to the same period, could not be sustained in light of the respondents' stand, and the petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
