Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3341 to 3360 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court quashed the order of adjudication passed u/s 74 and demand notice u/s 107 of the KGST/CGST Act. It held that the appellate authority erred in dismissing the appeal on the grounds of limitation and non-payment of 10% pre-deposit. The appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit, and the affidavit for condonation of delay was not considered. The matter was remitted back to the appellate authority for reconsideration of the appeal on merits, including the issue of non-payment of 10% pre-deposit, in accordance with law.
The High Court quashed the order of adjudication passed u/s 74 and demand notice u/s 107 of the KGST/CGST Act. It held that the appellate authority erred in dismissing the appeal on the grounds of limitation and non-payment of 10% pre-deposit. The appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit, and the affidavit for condonation of delay was not considered. The matter was remitted back to the appellate authority for reconsideration of the appeal on merits, including the issue of non-payment of 10% pre-deposit, in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
