Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
Penalty u/s 271AAB - treating an amount included in the Return of Income as undisclosed income susceptible to penalty - search conducted u/s 132, assessment carried out u/s 153A, additions made u/s 50C - assessee contended that without search, income from Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and cash transactions would not have been disclosed - Held: No reference to any statement recorded u/s 132(4) showing admission of undisclosed income, a prerequisite for invoking Section 271AAB(1A). Income from LTCG and cash transactions not alleged to be false by Revenue. LTCG otherwise taxable, transactions routed through banking channels, advance tax paid, hence cannot be treated as undisclosed income. Coordinate Bench decision in assessee's wife's case affirmed the view. Imposition of 30% penalty on alleged undisclosed income u/s 271AAB(1A)(a) not justified.
Penalty u/s 271AAB - treating an amount included in the Return of Income as undisclosed income susceptible to penalty - search conducted u/s 132, assessment carried out u/s 153A, additions made u/s 50C - assessee contended that without search, income from Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and cash transactions would not have been disclosed - Held: No reference to any statement recorded u/s 132(4) showing admission of undisclosed income, a prerequisite for invoking Section 271AAB(1A). Income from LTCG and cash transactions not alleged to be false by Revenue. LTCG otherwise taxable, transactions routed through banking channels, advance tax paid, hence cannot be treated as undisclosed income. Coordinate Bench decision in assessee's wife's case affirmed the view. Imposition of 30% penalty on alleged undisclosed income u/s 271AAB(1A)(a) not justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.