Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner having jurisdiction over transfer pricing matters has been empowered, effective April 1, 2022, to invoke revisionary action u/s 263 regarding orders passed by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) under their administrative control. The amendment aimed to resolve confusion over revisionary powers concerning TPO orders, particularly after the 2014 notification defining the command chain from Principal Chief Commissioner (International Taxation) to Deputy/Assistant Commissioner (Transfer Pricing). The lawmaker included the "Transfer Pricing Officer" alongside the Assessing Officer for revisionary orders by the respective Principal Commissioner or Commissioner. When statutory provisions are unambiguous, no interpretation is permissible. Only the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner can exercise revisionary authority over TPO orders under their command from April 1, 2022. The order passed by the Principal CIT, Madurai-1 was without valid jurisdiction and deserves quashing. The Assessing Officer's order u/s 143(3) read with Section 144B did not warrant revisionary powers as it lacked deficiencies prejudicial to revenue interests. Consequently, the Principal CIT's order u/s 263 is void ab initio and quashed in favor of the assessee.
The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner having jurisdiction over transfer pricing matters has been empowered, effective April 1, 2022, to invoke revisionary action u/s 263 regarding orders passed by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) under their administrative control. The amendment aimed to resolve confusion over revisionary powers concerning TPO orders, particularly after the 2014 notification defining the command chain from Principal Chief Commissioner (International Taxation) to Deputy/Assistant Commissioner (Transfer Pricing). The lawmaker included the "Transfer Pricing Officer" alongside the Assessing Officer for revisionary orders by the respective Principal Commissioner or Commissioner. When statutory provisions are unambiguous, no interpretation is permissible. Only the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner can exercise revisionary authority over TPO orders under their command from April 1, 2022. The order passed by the Principal CIT, Madurai-1 was without valid jurisdiction and deserves quashing. The Assessing Officer's order u/s 143(3) read with Section 144B did not warrant revisionary powers as it lacked deficiencies prejudicial to revenue interests. Consequently, the Principal CIT's order u/s 263 is void ab initio and quashed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
