Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Assessee offered translation gain from revenue transactions for taxation. CIT(A) deleted disallowance of translation gain from merger of branch balance sheet, holding it non-taxable based on ICAI accounting standards and consistency principle. CBDT circular clarified such translation gains/losses are not real income, upheld by Delhi High Court. Excise duty refunds received by assessee were treated as capital receipts by CIT(A), not taxable revenue receipts, based on Gujarat High Court ruling that refunds aimed to promote industries satisfy 'purpose test' for capital nature. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues in favor of assessee.
Assessee offered translation gain from revenue transactions for taxation. CIT(A) deleted disallowance of translation gain from merger of branch balance sheet, holding it non-taxable based on ICAI accounting standards and consistency principle. CBDT circular clarified such translation gains/losses are not real income, upheld by Delhi High Court. Excise duty refunds received by assessee were treated as capital receipts by CIT(A), not taxable revenue receipts, based on Gujarat High Court ruling that refunds aimed to promote industries satisfy 'purpose test' for capital nature. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.