Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Assessee offered translation gain from revenue transactions for taxation. CIT(A) deleted disallowance of translation gain from merger of branch balance sheet, holding it non-taxable based on ICAI accounting standards and consistency principle. CBDT circular clarified such translation gains/losses are not real income, upheld by Delhi High Court. Excise duty refunds received by assessee were treated as capital receipts by CIT(A), not taxable revenue receipts, based on Gujarat High Court ruling that refunds aimed to promote industries satisfy 'purpose test' for capital nature. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues in favor of assessee.
Assessee offered translation gain from revenue transactions for taxation. CIT(A) deleted disallowance of translation gain from merger of branch balance sheet, holding it non-taxable based on ICAI accounting standards and consistency principle. CBDT circular clarified such translation gains/losses are not real income, upheld by Delhi High Court. Excise duty refunds received by assessee were treated as capital receipts by CIT(A), not taxable revenue receipts, based on Gujarat High Court ruling that refunds aimed to promote industries satisfy 'purpose test' for capital nature. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
