Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Inadvertence claim untenable, delay in rectifying alleged error reflects absence of inadvertence. Petitioner withdrew higher value complaint, pursued lower value complaint, then approached mediation without realizing inadvertence. Petitioner revived execution petition for arbitral award recovery instead of complaint cases, indicating deliberate choice. Application u/s 362 CrPC for recall filed belatedly after six months, dismissed by magistrate. Conduct inconsistent with inadvertence claim. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
Inadvertence claim untenable, delay in rectifying alleged error reflects absence of inadvertence. Petitioner withdrew higher value complaint, pursued lower value complaint, then approached mediation without realizing inadvertence. Petitioner revived execution petition for arbitral award recovery instead of complaint cases, indicating deliberate choice. Application u/s 362 CrPC for recall filed belatedly after six months, dismissed by magistrate. Conduct inconsistent with inadvertence claim. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
