Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Inadvertence claim untenable, delay in rectifying alleged error reflects absence of inadvertence. Petitioner withdrew higher value complaint, pursued lower value complaint, then approached mediation without realizing inadvertence. Petitioner revived execution petition for arbitral award recovery instead of complaint cases, indicating deliberate choice. Application u/s 362 CrPC for recall filed belatedly after six months, dismissed by magistrate. Conduct inconsistent with inadvertence claim. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
Inadvertence claim untenable, delay in rectifying alleged error reflects absence of inadvertence. Petitioner withdrew higher value complaint, pursued lower value complaint, then approached mediation without realizing inadvertence. Petitioner revived execution petition for arbitral award recovery instead of complaint cases, indicating deliberate choice. Application u/s 362 CrPC for recall filed belatedly after six months, dismissed by magistrate. Conduct inconsistent with inadvertence claim. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.