Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
The Committee of Creditors (CoC) resolved to liquidate the Corporate Debtor u/s 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by a majority of 90.16% voting in favor, considering the bleak chances of insolvency resolution amid ongoing investigations and attachment of assets by the Directorate of Enforcement under the PMLA, 2002. The CoC appointed Mr. Santanu T. Ray as the Liquidator with his written consent. The Supreme Court in K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank held that the CoC's decisions based on commercial wisdom are non-justiciable. The Tribunal has limited powers of judicial review in such matters and allowed the application, opining that the Corporate Debtor should be liquidated as per the Code.
The Committee of Creditors (CoC) resolved to liquidate the Corporate Debtor u/s 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by a majority of 90.16% voting in favor, considering the bleak chances of insolvency resolution amid ongoing investigations and attachment of assets by the Directorate of Enforcement under the PMLA, 2002. The CoC appointed Mr. Santanu T. Ray as the Liquidator with his written consent. The Supreme Court in K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank held that the CoC's decisions based on commercial wisdom are non-justiciable. The Tribunal has limited powers of judicial review in such matters and allowed the application, opining that the Corporate Debtor should be liquidated as per the Code.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.