Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Committee of Creditors (CoC) resolved to liquidate the Corporate Debtor u/s 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by a majority of 90.16% voting in favor, considering the bleak chances of insolvency resolution amid ongoing investigations and attachment of assets by the Directorate of Enforcement under the PMLA, 2002. The CoC appointed Mr. Santanu T. Ray as the Liquidator with his written consent. The Supreme Court in K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank held that the CoC's decisions based on commercial wisdom are non-justiciable. The Tribunal has limited powers of judicial review in such matters and allowed the application, opining that the Corporate Debtor should be liquidated as per the Code.
The Committee of Creditors (CoC) resolved to liquidate the Corporate Debtor u/s 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by a majority of 90.16% voting in favor, considering the bleak chances of insolvency resolution amid ongoing investigations and attachment of assets by the Directorate of Enforcement under the PMLA, 2002. The CoC appointed Mr. Santanu T. Ray as the Liquidator with his written consent. The Supreme Court in K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank held that the CoC's decisions based on commercial wisdom are non-justiciable. The Tribunal has limited powers of judicial review in such matters and allowed the application, opining that the Corporate Debtor should be liquidated as per the Code.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
