Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed appeals challenging the interim order passed by the Adjudicating Authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, retaining/seizing/freezing documents, digital records, and bank accounts. The Enforcement Directorate had filed a prosecution complaint, wherein the appellants and other family members were accused. The properties were mentioned for confiscation upon conviction in the complaint case. The Tribunal held the impugned order as an interim step to protect the assets until trial conclusion, finding no illegality. However, the appellants were entitled to copies of relied-upon documents/seized material and could apply for release of unrequired documents, considering the prosecution complaint filing.
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed appeals challenging the interim order passed by the Adjudicating Authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, retaining/seizing/freezing documents, digital records, and bank accounts. The Enforcement Directorate had filed a prosecution complaint, wherein the appellants and other family members were accused. The properties were mentioned for confiscation upon conviction in the complaint case. The Tribunal held the impugned order as an interim step to protect the assets until trial conclusion, finding no illegality. However, the appellants were entitled to copies of relied-upon documents/seized material and could apply for release of unrequired documents, considering the prosecution complaint filing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
