Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Non-payment of service tax on car parking fee categorized as renting of immovable property service was held inadmissible based on Delhi High Court's ruling that parking services stand excluded entirely. Reimbursement of electricity charges collected from shop owners on actual consumption basis and paid to the electricity provider was held not liable for service tax as the assessee acted as a 'pure agent'. Signage charges demand was held time-barred due to lack of suppression of facts. Reversal of CENVAT credit was held inadmissible as service tax was paid on full invoice value. Interest and penalties were set aside as the demands were unsustainable. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Non-payment of service tax on car parking fee categorized as renting of immovable property service was held inadmissible based on Delhi High Court's ruling that parking services stand excluded entirely. Reimbursement of electricity charges collected from shop owners on actual consumption basis and paid to the electricity provider was held not liable for service tax as the assessee acted as a 'pure agent'. Signage charges demand was held time-barred due to lack of suppression of facts. Reversal of CENVAT credit was held inadmissible as service tax was paid on full invoice value. Interest and penalties were set aside as the demands were unsustainable. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
