Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In cases where an assessee has wrongfully availed self-credit, the inadmissible credit needs to be recovered if not reversed by the assessee within the specified period, following the procedure laid down under Notification No. 19/2008. The authorities must issue a notice and follow the prescribed manner for recovery u/s 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Rejecting the refund without adhering to the statutory procedure is legally incorrect. The order becomes superfluous if the alleged wrongful credit has not been established through the proper manner. The appellants are entitled to a refund calculated as per Notification No. 19/2008, since the rejection of the cash refund was not legally valid.
In cases where an assessee has wrongfully availed self-credit, the inadmissible credit needs to be recovered if not reversed by the assessee within the specified period, following the procedure laid down under Notification No. 19/2008. The authorities must issue a notice and follow the prescribed manner for recovery u/s 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Rejecting the refund without adhering to the statutory procedure is legally incorrect. The order becomes superfluous if the alleged wrongful credit has not been established through the proper manner. The appellants are entitled to a refund calculated as per Notification No. 19/2008, since the rejection of the cash refund was not legally valid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
